Skip to content
Trusteed Control

Decide the conditions under which you accept a delegated action.

It combines agent context, rules, risk and human confirmation to make visible a decision that otherwise stays scattered across systems.

Guided pilots with visible state: what is current, what is conditional and what remains planned.

Trusteed Control

A valid identity does not answer whether the action is acceptable to the recipient.

An agent can pass identity verification and still run an action the merchant would never have approved: an out-of-range discount, an order that drains a promotion, a retry that duplicates a charge. Control combines agent context, economic rules, risk signals and human steps to decide how an operation proceeds before the cost appears.

01

Understand the context

A technical identifier does not explain who operates the agent, for what purpose or under what mandate. Receive identity and authorisation signals instead of treating every request as equivalent.

A basis for a reasoned decision, not an assumption.
02

Apply conditions

Amount, frequency, discount or purchase pattern may require a different outcome than a standard purchase. Without explicit rules every valid request is treated the same, and that is where abuse gets through.

Allow, review or block, explainable per operation.
03

Keep human control

When policy requires it (a high amount, an unusual pattern) the agent waits for explicit confirmation instead of continuing on its own.

Agent autonomy does not replace the merchant.
The mechanism, not the promise

Four steps between the agent's request and the decision the merchant sees.

Control is not a black box that approves or rejects. Every step leaves a visible reason, and the merchant defines the cut-off point in advance.

01
Agent contextSignature, declared identity and the surface it acts from
available
02
Economic rulesAmount, discount, frequency and pattern against merchant limits
evaluated
03
Risk signalThe combination of signals decides whether the case needs review
review
04
Human confirmationIf policy requires it, a person confirms before checkout
in pilot
What each party gains

Control does not add friction. It makes visible the decision you were already making blind.

The same mechanism produces a different outcome depending on who looks at it.

01in pilot
FOR THE MERCHANT

You set the limit before it is crossed.

Instead of discovering abuse after the charge, you define in advance which condition triggers review or block.

  • Your own rules, not a generic policy
  • A decision you can explain to your team
  • Revocation on supported surfaces
02in pilot
FOR THE AGENT

It knows what to expect before trying.

An explained rejection is more useful than a generic error: the agent can replan instead of retrying blind.

  • Explicit output: allow, review or block
  • The reason for the decision, not just a code
  • Fewer wasted retries
03planned
FOR WHOEVER CONFIRMS

They get just enough to decide.

Human confirmation is only useful if it arrives with enough context and at a moment when the operation can still be stopped.

  • Operation context, not a bare alert
  • A single step to approve or reject
  • A trace of who confirmed and when
Honest state of each piece

Not everything that makes up Control is at the same maturity.

Before designing a pilot it helps to know what is operational today and what remains conditional on a pending requirement.

in pilot

Agent context verification

Guided access, not a public API yet

agent verification
in pilot

Economic rules engine

Amount, frequency, discount per merchant

POL
in pilot

Transactional risk signals

A combination of signals to flag review

RISK
in pilot

Human confirmation

Hold until confirmation on supported surfaces

human review
in pilot

Revocation

Cut off an agent's access mid-flight

REV
Without Control versus with Control

The difference is not whether the agent can buy. It is who decides under what condition.

Without a control layer every valid request executes the same, and abuse is discovered at reconciliation. With Control, the condition is evaluated before checkout.

Without Control
  • Verified identity = executed action. Abuse is detected in the dispute, once it has already cost money.
With Control
  • Verified identity = starting point. Policy decides allow, review or block before the cost appears.
Before designing the pilot

What people evaluating Control usually ask.

Does Control replace my rules engine or my current anti-fraud?

No. It sits before the delegated action executes and uses the signals you already have. It does not replace your risk system, checkout or payment provider.

What if the agent cannot wait for human confirmation?

Policy defines the limit: below a threshold the operation may continue on its own; above it, it waits for confirmation. The merchant sets that threshold, not Trusteed.

Do I need to expose a public API to start?

No. Access to agent verification is guided during the pilot. A public API with authentication, rate limiting and metrics is a later step, subject to its own pending requirements.

How long until a result is visible?

A pilot is scoped to one concrete sensitive operation. The metric (explained decisions, correct reviews or loss avoided) is defined before starting, not at the end.

A next step, not a broad promise

Design a Control pilot

The next step is one sensitive operation, one policy and one decision metric. We do not present agent verification or risk as an available standalone product until their pending requirements are met.

Trusteed Control — decide the conditions under which you accept a delegated action